The Herald has this
week ran a piece by its Chief Football Writer, which is a straight
rant at the Scottish Government, for simply floating the notion that
“Strict Liability” for the behaviour of their fans might be
imposed on Scotland's football clubs – perhaps as a means of taking
OBFA off the statute book.
Matthew Lindsay, the
current holder of the post of Chief Football Writer for the Herald
goes on, in his article, to make it clear, in his view this is a load
of keech. Well, Matthew is Scottish football's undoubted expert on
keech – he's been writing it for years where Rangers is concerned.
In my view, were the fabled position of Right Worthy Master of the
Lap Top Loyal ludge to exist, Mr Lindsay would be the holder of that
position.
As I have said, often,
Offensive Behaviour at Football is not the preserve of the Old Firm
clubs, collectively or individually, but, there are more fans of
these clubs, so, it stands to reason, they are likely to have more
bams than any other clubs, bams who are liable to indulge in
offensive behaviour at football.
Professional football
is a branch of the entertainment industry. As such, football clubs
are liable to uphold certain standards of behaviour. For instance, if
the police are repeatedly called to a pub, because there are fights
there every night, or even every weekend, at closing time – it
would not be long before, when that pub's application to renew their
licence came up, the Polis would be objecting, on the grounds of
repeated bad behaviour.
If there is evidence of
repeated drug-taking, fighting and anti-social behaviour at a club or
dance hall, again, the Polis will object and, if the case is strong
enough – the licence goes.
Funnily enough, in
spite of one set of fans seemingly glorying in the late Dan Archer's
description of them as: “A constant embarrassment and occasional
disgrace”. In spite of the proven spike in assaults, admissions to
A&E, incidences of wife-beating etc, which follows Old Firm
games, not to mention the high arrest rates both inside and outside
the grounds at such games – we never hear of Ibrox or Celtic Park
being threatened with closure. Football has been treated as a special
case, and has had an easy ride for generations.
Generations of
youngsters in Motherwell, Kilmarnock, Aberdeen, Dundee etc., have
been taken by their fathers to watch their local team playing –
but, have not, until their Dad considers them old enough, been taken
to games when the Old Firm comes calling – their excesses have been
tolerated, for far too long.
And, before the Celtic
Family seize the moral high ground here, I would refer them to the
wise counsel of Rev Stuart Campbell, who runs the excellent
pro-independence website, Wings Over Scotland. The Rev, who is an
avowed Aberdeen fan maintains: “75% of the Rangers support are
knobheads, only about 50% of the Celtic support are thus”. Loath
though I am to disagree with the Rev, I feel his percentages are a
bit low there.
When OBFA was brought
in, the majority of the fans of the “diddy” teams supported it –
the opposition came mainly from the Old Firm. This hardened somewhat
once the Celtic fans realised, the Act was not designed to catch the
bad guys who followed Rangers, but, could also capture the Celtic
lunatic fringe.
Every club has its
lunatic fringe, again, I state the obvious, the Old Firm's lunatic
fringe is bigger, so, if OBFA can weed them out first, it is win-win.
That said, OBFA is
flawed Law, badly-drafted, hurriedly-introduced, but, it is better
than nothing. We are now beginning to see the flaws in OBFA, so,
perhaps the time is right to review it, or tweak it. For myself, I
honestly believe, “strict liability” is the way ahead, because,
it would force the clubs, particularly the Bigot Brothers, to
finally, get off their erses and do something about their: “constant
embarrassment and occasional disgrace”.
Let us assume, “strict
liability” is brought in. Let us also assume, and this one is
harder for me to get my head round – that the will exists within
the Hampden corridors of power to make SL work. The first match day
in which SL applies – the fans of a certain Glasgow club reprise
their favourite ditty of the moment, that one about being up to their
knees in a scarlet bodily fluid emitting from persons who follow the
Roman Catholic faith.
This community singing
is considered to be offensive, and the club is fined. The following
week, it happens again – again the club is fined. It happens a
third time, but, this time, instead of fining the club, they are
deducted three points. I suggest, it would not be long before the
club took action to ban the miscreants.
As I have said before,
the community singing is perhaps more prevalent at away games, where
the ticket allocation tends to be distributed via organised
Supporters Clubs. Since the technology exists today to pin-point
where the choristers are sitting – it would be easy to discover to
which SC they belonged. A warning letter to the secretary of that
club, followed by, if it happens again – a ban on that club's
members getting tickets – problem solved in jig time.
The football clubs and
the game's wider authorities would need to do a bit of work to rid
the game of the lunatic fringe, but, it could be done. Again,
however, I question if the will to act is there.
No comments:
Post a Comment