JUST occasionally, I feel sorry
for the stenographers on the sports desks of the Glasgow-published
papers, as they struggle to maintain the artery-blocking,
obesity-causing over-feeding of the Old Firm fan-base, who will
swallow just about any old shite concerning their clubs.
The stenographers really come
into their own during those frenetic periods of the year when the
transfer windows are open, and they can excel themselves writing
exclusives about who is going to be the next big signing by one or
other of the Bigot Brothers. Of course, this isn't as much fun these
days, with one half being skint and forced to deal in the
Poundstretcher and Bargain Basement end of the market, while the mob
across the city can at least afford to shop in Lidl and Aldi.
But, to their credit the Lap Top
Loyal and the Celtic Apologists still manage to come up with the
goods more often than not. I was particularly impressed this morning
by one piece in what used to be a serious broadsheet, this reckoned,
because Celtic are currently rolling in cash, they ought to splash
out and buy a second club in some other continent.
Pure pish. Now, I have no
problems with any top-flight Scottish club setting-up a feeder club,
but, I would prefer that feeder club be firstly, Scottish, or,
secondly, based in one of the other nations of the UK. I appreciate
there might be obstacles to, for instance, Rangers buying Ayr United
or Celtic buying Dumbarton and running them as “feeder” clubs.
Some would argue, if this were
to happen – and I plucked those two clubs out of thin air as it
were – should the Scottish Cup draw come out: Ayr United v Rangers,
and Celtic v Dumbarton, then there would be suggestions the ties
would be fixed. That is understandable.
But, look at it this way; there
is no way either Rangers of Celtic would willingly “throw” a
Scottish Cup match against what would be an associate club. To
suggest that is preposterous. OK, theoretically, there could be an
attempted betting coup, but, in Scotland, the bookies would surely
spot the trend of money going on the outsiders.
Also, what a gift to the main
club, if the feeder outfit won. After all, Ayr and Dumbarton, the
teams I am using for demonstration purposes, would be there to
develop new talent for Rangers and Celtic. What a boost for the big
two to realise, they had genuine quality players coming through, and
what a wake-up call to their players, to realise, within the broader
club umbrella, there are players ready to come in and displace them.
It is often said, well it was
before Warren Gatland went down the road of picking Welshmen first,
Englishmen second, Irishmen third and only picking Scotsmen when
everyone else was injured, that if you were picked for the British
and Irish Lions rugby squad, your biggest opponent was the guy you
were battling for the Test match shirt.
It would be the same if a feeder
team met the big team; the players in the big team would know – the
kid I am going head-to-head with is after my shirt, well, he isn't
getting it. Nine times out of ten, the big team would win, in fact, I
would say, more than 90 times out of 100, the big team would win.
Say Celtic, because let's face
it Rangers are skint so they don't have this option, was to go for a
feeder club outwith Scotland. Where would they establish such a club?
Well, they could look to England, picking a League Two or League One
side. Then, suppose that side was to get into the Premiership, well,
there you have it, Celtic in the top flight in England, the dream for
a few on the board and many in the stands.
But, given the club's Irish
heritage, Celtic taking over, or even establishing a team somewhere
in the Republic of Ireland would make sound business and sporting
sense. Similarly, Rangers could well think of a team in the
(Northern) Irish League as one worth buying – but, would Linfield
appreciate the approach?
If it worked for the Big Two,
why not for Aberdeen, or the Edinburgh or Dundee clubs too?
WEE Jim Spence, well-known
“Ginger” and Dundee United-minded journalist has caused a wee bit
of a stooshie in Jute City this week, with his suggestion that Dundee
and Dundee United might amalgamate and form “Dundee City”, making
the City of Discovery a one-team city.
Needless to say, on Tayside,
this went down like a fart in a space suit. I fear the lovely Jim
might need to seek refuge in Glasgow for a time. Such is the
tribalism in Scottish fitba, that one is as much of a runner as the
late, great Wallace Mercer's abortive attempt to form Edinburgh City
by amalgamating Hearts and Hibs.
Mind you, Jim has a point, we
have too-many “senior” clubs in Scotland. I reckon, at most, we
should have a 20-club senior division, below that, the clubs should
be part-time, “community” clubs, geared to bringing through local
talent and selling these players on to the senior clubs.
HERE we are, two months into
2017, the European competitions are about to kick-off again, but,
Scotland's top clubs are out in the cold. What can we do?
Can I resurrect a suggestion I
made some years ago? Why doesn't the SFA contact their friends in
Scandinavia and see about restoring the old Royal League to the
football calendar, but, with Scottish clubs participating?
The Royal League was a
competition which ran for a few seasons during the 2000s, involving
the top four clubs from Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Put four Scottish
clubs into this and you have a 16-club competition which would
surely, if our big two were involved, win TV coverage and mean
additional European exposure for Scottish teams and players.
If it worked, perhaps the
Icelandic and Finnish leagues would wish to become involved, and, who
knows, if proposals to make the Champions League even more of a
closed shop for the major leagues, this competition could become
popular among the small and mid-ranking European nations.
FINALLY, perhaps because last
weekend was a Six Nations Rugby one, I saw one or two commentators
suggesting it was time we brought Television Match Officials into
football. This followed Celtic getting a penalty that never was at St
Johnstone.
One wee problem with that
particular spot kick. The incident would not have come under the
remit of a TMO in rugby. A second wee problem is, football is more
free-flowing than rugby; the fans wouldn't like constant
interruptions while the TMO is consulted. We have to remember,
football players and coaches are more-argumentative than rugby
players, unless a tennis-style challenges system was introduced,
games would last two days, with all the arguing that would ensue
about whose ball it was.
I can accept the benefits of
TMOs, but, bringing them in will mean crossing a legal mine field.
20 club top division with two 12 team divisions below, or regional divisions perhaps would be good.
ReplyDelete