SO
Ian Maxwell it is who will pick-up the poisoned chalice of being the
new Chief Executive of the Scottish Football Association. Good luck
to the former Partick Thistle Honcho, because he is going to need it.
New SFA CEO Ian Maxwell
I
don't think the SFA has had a decent CEO since Ernie Walker retired,
and it hasn't helped that, from back then, the game has become more
and more about the Bigot Brothers and less about the general game. I
genuinely feel Scottish football would be better off without the two
permanently-warring Glasgow families – then the rest of us could
settle down to a more-even game, rather than one dominated by two
massive corporations and their huge following.
Ian
Maxwell is, there is no denying, an insider appointment; he knows
where some, if not all the bodies are buried, and he certainly knows
which presses should remain firmly shut. Perhaps an outsider being
appointed might work, but, Ah hae ma doots.
The
last guy, after all, came from Yorkshire County Cricket Club, a body
notorious across the cricket world for in-fighting, factionalism and
under-performing. Yorkshiremen are, some say, simply Scotsmen without
the intelligence; Stewart Reagan managed OK among the Tykes at
Headingley, I think he is now happy to be out of Hampden.
Maxwell
is a former player, he has done his time on the coaching field, so,
he comes to the job better-equipped to understand the whole picture
than anyone since the early days of football, when the players ran
the game, as well as played it. Let's hope, with his time on the
grass, he can shake-up the suits who think it's all about them rather
than the players and the fans.
But,
he faces some huge challenges, not least funding and organising
Hampden's transformation into a 21st century stadium at a
time of political and financial uncertainty. Still he comes from
Thistle, a club not unfamiliar with handling hardship.
I
CAN just visualise the scene, as the Sports Editor and his team on
any Scottish msm title you care to name finalise their back page and
their online site content. The Sports Editor will ask: “OK, what's
our big Old Firm story?” To be fair, this is not crucial for the
print edition, however, for the online site – they have to have a
good Old Firm story as clickbait to get the punters onto the site.
Today's
clickbait of choice is the new Celtic kit for next season and the
reaction to it. According to The Scotsman's website, sections of the
Celtic Family are not happy, because their precious Hoops have been
broken-up. Ach! This is nothing new, it has happened before and they
should know – when it comes to the so-called purity of the Hoops
and money, purity is for paupers.
The
real scandal for me is the way football has prostituted itself for
shirt sponsorship. The Celtic and Rangers strips are adorned with the
logos of downmarket betting companies, which is a sure indication of
the paucity, in all respects, of Scottish football. If the Bigot
Brothers genuinely were BIG clubs, playing in a big league, they
would have big companies keen to put their name on the shirts.
LA Lakers (right) New York Yankees (below)
Of
course, in the major North American sports, where the money really is
big – as these pictures show – the mammoth clubs have no need of
shirt sponsors. Yes, I'm old-fashioned, I would rather see the Old
Firm still wearing classic strips like these below, and having players of the quality of these two would also help:
Jim Baxter
Bobby Murdoch
“SPORTING
INTEGRITY” was something of a buzz phrase during all the moger
around Rangers' collapse, back in 2012. Remember the calls for
title-stripping because Rangers had somehow “cheated” by using
EBTs to part pay their bigger stars.
As
I said at the time EBTs weren't illegal, Rangers simply took bad
advice and used the wrong model. In any case, if they hadn't had
access to EBTs, they would have used some other means of attracting
big-money players to Ibrox.
But,
right now, in Rugby, we have a classic case of “sporting
integrity”, the likes of which you would never get in football. In
the Guinness PRO14 competition, Glasgow Warriors have already
clinched a home semi-final place by winning Conference A.
Edinburgh
are in third place in Conference B, but, can still be caught by
Ulster. The final regular-season games take place on Saturday, with
Edinburgh facing Glasgow at Murrayfield in a cross-conference game,
while Ulster are away to Munster in aother.
Edinburgh
are four points clear of the Belfast team, so, they need either a
draw or to lose by less than seven points, while also scoring four
tries, to accrue the two points which will take them out of Ulster's
reach.
Glasgow v Edinburgh, an SRU inter-departmental game
Edinburgh
and Glasgow are both wholly-owned subsidiaries of the SRU, who would
clearly love to see both their sides in the play-offs, and thereby
guaranteed a place in the Champions Cup – rugby's equivalent of the
Champions League next season.
Munster
and Ulster are both subsidiaries of the Irish RFU, who would also
like to see their clubs in Europe's top competition next season. So,
you can see, the potential for the powers that be at Murrayfield and
in Dublin to try to arrange the results they want is there.
Now,
say what you like about the guys along the sixth-floor corridor at
Hampden, they would never leave themselves in a position where they
might be tempted to “arrange” say an Old Firm match, for the
betterment of Scottish football.
Wonderful
thing “sporting integrity” and Glasgow v Edinburgh rivalry. I
wonder what will happen on Saturday night.
No comments:
Post a Comment