IS
IT ME, or does anyone else think
the efforts of the mainstream media to talk-up an attempted Celtic
loan deal to bring Fraser Forster back to the club is one of the
clearest demonstrations yet that big-time football has lost its
collective marbles?
Celtic bringing back Fraser Forster - why?
We
hear Scott Bain,
the club's first-choice 'keeper has a dislocated thumb, which will
keep him out of action for at least one, perhaps two weeks. Within
that time scale, Celtic are due to play:
- Dunfermline Athletic in the League Cup, this afternoon.
- AIK Stockholm in the Europa League on Thursday
- Hearts in the League on Sunday week
- The return game with AIK on 29 August
The
prognosis is that Bain will be fit to return to action by the time
Celtic
go to Ibrox
to face Rangers on
Sunday, 1 September.
With
Bain injured, the gloves are due to pass to their Number Two
goalkeeper, a certain Craig
Gordon. Aged 36, with
over 500 first team
games
at his various clubs, plus 54
Scotland caps, Gordon
is no callow youth.
Their
third choice goalkeeper, as listed in their First
team squad, is
Northern Irishman
Conor Hazard. Now, it
is true that Hazard has yet to make his first team debut for the
Hoops; but, he is already a full Northern
Ireland internationalist,
who has made over 20 first team appearances in the Scottish
Championship for
Falkirk and
Partick Thistle on
loan deals.
Their
Reserve squad
goalkeeper is
teenager Ryan Mullen,
who is already a
Scotland age group internationalist. They also have Scotland
Under-21 goalkeeper Ross Doohan, currently
on-loan to Ayr United,
who could presumably
be called back in an emergency, such as the first-choice goalkeeper
being injured.
Hazard,
Mullin and Doohan are all on minimum four-year deals with Celtic.
So,
why all the kerfuffle about bringing back to the club, a 31-year-old,
who has played precisely 90 minutes of first-team football since
December, 2017?
The
only reason I can see for Celtic possibly bringing in Forster is for
them to be able to say to the rest of Scottish football: “We
are so rich we can bring in, as a temporary signing, a 31-year-old
former England internationalist, who is third-choice at his current
club, and on massive wages.
“It
also shows, we can keep three good young goalkeeprs tied to us on
long-term contracts, with no possibility of getting a game for us,
even in an emergency. That's how much bigger we are than all the
other Scottish clubs.”
It
is sheer, unmitigated lunacy.
AT
TIMES, such
as when watching BT
Sports' coverage
of last night's Motherwell
v Hearts League
Cup clash, I wonder where football is going. In particular, I fear
for the game's future in view of the legal diktats being handed-down
from on-high.
Yes
folks, I am back on this new interpretation of what is and what is
not a penalty. Last night we saw, not for the first time this year, a
spot kick awarded, which, by all the precedents of football going
back over 100 years, was never a penalty (except, of course under SFA
dispensations 16/90
and
18/88).
These two dispensations mean – if there is a dodgy hand ball by a
visiting defender at Ibrox or Celtic Park – it
is a penalty. If,
on the other hand, the dodgy hand ball refers to a Rangers or Celtic
defender – it
isn't a penalty.
The
new wording on penalties apparently refers to the defender changing
his silhouette. By having an arm out. FFS, I don't think I have ever
seen a defender standing with his arms by his side – other than
when in a defensive wall. Just to maintain his balance when moving,
the player has to have his arms out to some extent. It is the
“natural” silhouette which the law-makers are demanding which
seems unnatural to me.
What
has happened to one of football's great laws: Law
v (I) – which states: “The referee is the sole judge of fact.”
Today,
increasingly, the referee is not the sole judge of fact, but has to
officiate to a set of protocols, written down by a committee of IFAB
high heid yins. IFAB,
in case you don't know, is the -INTERNATIONAL
FOOTBALL ASSOCIATIONS BOARD, FIFA's ultimate
law-making body, and the SFA
has a permanent seat
on IFAB.
This
means one of the super-brains along Hampden's sixth floor corridor of
power has a direct say on the laws of the game.
This
perhaps explains why the new penalty law is such an ass – it was
in-part thought up by someone who, by their direction of Scottish
fitba these past few years has clearly demonstrated an inability to
run a bath.
Ignore masonic conspiracies - what would Big Tiny have made
of having committee-men decide what was or wasn't a penalty?
I
wonder what those wonderful Scottish referees of the past –
Craigmyle, Mowat,
Wharton, Valentine or McCluskey
would have made of this dog's dinner of the new penalty law. I don't
think they would have had much time for a ruling which takes away the
discretion, to judge each incident on merit, which was for so long an
integral part of the Beautiful Game.
I
wonder too, what will happen when, as it surely will, VAR
is introduced into
Scottish fitba. On that day, the ba' will be oan the slates, and no
mistake.
I
DESPAIR at
the lack of erudition and classical learning among today's leading
lights in the SWFA
(the
Scottish Football Writers Association).
The
likes of my wonderful late mentor – that Old
Rugbeian, Ian “Dan” Archer, having
endured an education of fagging, flogging and Latin declination would
have considered the storm in a latte glass of big Shelley
Kerr telling
it like it was to her team after Scotland's sorry exit from the
Women's World
Cup in
the summer as clear proof: In
vino veritas.”
Dan Archer would have had a take on the Women's team bust-up
So,
Shelley and her coaches maybe overdid it a wee bit on the Prosecco,
and, the next day, the big blonde from Broxburn, telt a few home
truths to her squad, and, we understood, tears and recriminations
were shared.
That
was quite civilised, I know of instances of all-out dressing room
wars at various male clubs. Indeed, I know of at least one instance
where a big, somewhat quiet centre half, was elevated to the club
captaincy, by the manager he had decked during one post-match debrief.
The
boss said: “After he decked me, I realised, here was the guy with
the passion for the club I needed. Before he hit me, I had my doubts
about his bottle, after that – he never looked back.”
Of
course, badly needing a big-enough squirrel to deflect attention away
from Celtic's midweek melt-down against FC
Cluj, the red top
rotweillers seized on the Kerr incident with relish. But, they
over-egged it, your average football fan read the story, shrugged and
said: “So what?”
Just
another day on Planet Fitba.
No comments:
Post a Comment