I HAVE long thought, he
may be sitting over there in Donegal, and he most-certainly is
obsessed with his subject, but, when it comes to events at Ibrox,
Phil Mac Giolla Bhain is more-often on the money than the guys he
terms “stenographers”, who take as gospel any old Level Five
pish.
Yesterday, the bold
Phil posted an “Exclusive”, to the effect the Scottish Government
is thinking of forcing the SFA to apply “strict liability” to the
clubs, and, the belief is, in return, OBFA, the Offensive Behaviour
at Football Act, might be removed from the statue
book/toned-down/seriously modifed, whatever.
Now, this blog has long
believed this is the only way to rid Scottish football of this
continuing stain on its reputation, but, as to it happening – Ah
continue tae hae ma doots.
I do not for a minute
believe the worst excesses of anti-social behaviour in Scottish
football only happen because of the game. No, a sober, sensible,
upright member of the community does not suddenly turn into a
screaming sectarian bigot, shouting and swearing at the opposition
the minute be passes through the turnstyle, only to turn back into a
model of decorum 90-odd minutes later when he leaves the ground.
Similarly, I support
the abolition of segregated schools, not on the grounds of any role
in eliminating bigotry and sectarian behaviour – which is all too
often taught and encouraged at home, but, on the grounds of cost. If
any religion wants to ram its theology down the throats of the young
– then encourage their parents to send them to Sabbath School, or
to religious schools AFTER they have done their due time in
compulsory general education. I don't see why those of us who have
little time for education should be promoting it out of our taxes.
Also, while, because
they have more fans, and therefore, it stands to reason, more bams –
I do not believe that ObatF is the sole domain of the Bigot Brothers.
You get offensive behaviour at Ayr United v Kilmarnock, St Mirren v
Morton, Motherwell v Hamilton, Hearts v Hibs, Dunfermline v Raith
Rovers, Dundee v Dundee United and, most-certainly at Auchinleck
Talbot v Cumnock games.
But, the worst excesses
happen when a certain couple of Glasgow teams get together, we have
to face that. I also believe, the football authorities are scared
stiff to make an example of these two teams.
Just imagine if strict
liability was brought in. The first chorus of the Billy Boys or that
chant in support of the IRA and strict liability would kick-in.
Perhaps a warning for the first such outburst, followed quickly by
the deduction of points. It would not be long before the clubs would
be forced to take action, bans would have to be imposed, making going
to football a much-more-pleasurable experience for us all.
For instance, and here
I am not picking-on the Rangers fans, merely pointing out, as: “a
continuing embarrassment and occasional disgrace”, they, arguably,
are the worst mass offenders. We all know the accompanying
sound-track to any Rangers away game is a 90-minute singalongabigot
rendition of the old Party Song Book. We also know, such is the depth
of that club's fan base that the great majority of their ticket
allocation for away games is distributed via their strong network of
supporters clubs.
So, the club knows
which supporters clubs are in which sections of their allocated
seating. The technology exists to record the offensive singing, and
to separate accurately where it is coming from.
Thus, we have a
hypothetical scenario whereby – we assume strict liability has been
brought in. At an Aberdeen v Rangers game at Pittodrie, the strains
of the Billy Boys, up to yer knees etc and all is coming from the
seats where the Rangers fans are congregated. The singing is
pin-pointed at say Section D of that part of the ground. The tickets
in Section D were allocated to the members of The Kilwinning True
Blues and the Larkhall Loyal (apologies if such clubs exist, I am
using these names as stereotypes and no offence is meant).
So, Rangers can drop a
quick note to the secretaries of these two clubs, pointing-out: we
have you bang to rights – any more singing of offensive songs and
you don't get a ticket allocation. Pretty soon, the neanderthals
would be flung out of the clubs and, perhaps over a season, the
offensive singing would stop.
Same thing on the other
side – any bad behaviour which could be shown to emanate from the
seats occupied by (again stereotypical names here) – The Carfin
Sons of Erin or the Croy Sean South Memorial CSC and the same
sanctions would apply.
BUT, and it is a shame
there has to be a but. For the SFA to clamp down on the bigots, and
their copy-cat wannabees from the other clubs, would require a desire
within the Hampden corridors of power, to see things change. And, I
honestly do not see the will being there to make the changes.
The blazers know there
are at least a couple of really unsightly plooks on the face of
Scottish football, but, they are quite happy to parade these before
the world. And, that is sad.
WOE, WOE and thrice woe
– you can already hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from
Hampden, with the suggestion that those European leagues with huge TV
audiences might be about to hijack the Champions League, and make it
a closed shop.
It could well happen
that the CL becomes a closed shop, with entry limited to the top four
clubs in England, Italy, Germany and Spain, but, not least because it
would be only a matter of time before the English fell-out with
everyone else, I don't see this happening.
And even if it did, it
might not be the end of the world. Some see this proposal as the
start of a European NFL. What they forget is, the NFL is an
amalgamation of two separate American Football bodies – the NFC and
the AFC, just as baseball is an amalgamation of two leagues – the
National League and the American League.
If you know your
American sports history, you will know, baseball's World Series is
so-named, because the newspaper, the New York World, put up the cash
which caused the two league winners to meet to decide what was the
best team in the USA.
So, suppose the big
five European leagues do succeed in getting their closed shop past
UEFA – which is not guaranteed, in fact, I would say downright
unlikely – can you see the other 49 individual European leagues
simply stepping back and telling the big five: “OK guys, go ahead
and do your thing”. A compromise will be reached.
But, in the unlikely
event of this not happening, and the big five breaking away – what
is to stop the medium and smaller leagues starting a rival
competition. Celtic v Ajax, or PSG v Red Star Belgrade could surely
provide football as good as anywhere else.
If a rival league was
started, in time, I am sure, we would have a genuine European NFL,
but, it would not be limited to a mere five nations.
Mind you, at least one
of these big five leagues – the English Premiership, has bigger
problems looming. If “Brexit means Brexit”, and it becomes
more-difficult for European immigrants to enter the UK, once the
present batch of continental players finish, it will become a damned
sight harder for the top English club to attract top European talent.
There will be a lot of
squealing if a top Polish plumber cannot come to England to work,
but, a top Polish centre forward can. FIFA and UEFA have protocols in
place for player movement, which would cut across any efforts by a
non-EU England to bring in players from mainland Europe.
Mind you, one possible
good thing about this, would be, the English clubs would again,
hopefully, start recruiting top Scots. Aye, these are indeed
interesting times.