Socrates MacSporran

Socrates MacSporran
No I am not Chick Young, but I can remember when Scottish football was good

Friday, 1 November 2024

The Lunatics Are Running The Asylum

I HAVE LONG FELT – the management model which the various factions who have had control of Rangers FC since the excrement hit the air agitator back in 2012 has been, regardless of who was in-charge, a classic case of Institutionalised Madness – continually doing the same thing in the vain hope of something changing.

The management model followed has been the same as David Holmes and Graeme Souness introduced what I call “The Viv Nicholson Method” of “Spend, Spend, Spend” in running the club.

The club has been in existence for 150 years, a period which can be broken-down into six different eras:

  1. The Early years – 1872 to 1920

  2. The Bill Struth Years – 1920 to 1954

  3. The Scot Symon Years – 1954 to 1970

  4. The Willie Waddell/Jock Wallace Years – 1970 to 1986

  5. The Graeme Souness/David Murray Years – 1986 to 2012

  6. The Modern Era – 2012 to 2024

The level of success over each of these different eras is:

  1. 13 trophies in 48 years – 24.5% trophy wins

  2. 30 trophies in 34 years – 50% trophy wins

  3. 15 trophies in 15 years – 33.3% trophy wins

  4. 16 trophies in 16 years – 33.3% trophy wins

  5. 35 trophies in 26 years – 44.9% trophy wins

  6. 3 trophies in 12 years – 8.3% trophy wins

Of course, when looking into the history of one or other of Scotland's two dominant football clubs, we journalists are required – for balance – to do a similar job on the other club. The figures for Celtic under their various eras and managers/owners is:

  1. The Early Years - 1888 to 1896

  2. The Willie Maley Years – 1897 to 1940

  3. The Bob Kelly Years – 1941 to 1965

  4. The Jock Stein Years – 1965 to 1978

  5. The Four Families Years – 1978 to 1994

  6. The Fergus McCann Years – 1994 to 1999

  7. The Dermot Desmond Years – 1999 to 2024

The level of success over each of these different eras is:

  1. 4 trophies in 9 years – 28.6% trophy wins

  2. 30 trophies in 43 years – 37.5% trophy wins

  3. 5 trophies in 15 years – 9.4% trophy wins

  4. 24 trophies in 13 years – 61.5% trophy wins

  5. 10 trophies in 16 years – 20.8% trophy wins

  6. 3 trophies in 5 years - 20% trophy wins

  7. 41 trophies in 23 years – 71.9% trophy wins

The record is a wee bit like looking at a pendulum, one of the clubs is on top for a spell, then it swings back and the other lot have their spell as top dogs. Unfortunately for Rangers, at the moment, Celtic are in the driving seat and, given the current situation, it appears likely that this situaton will continue for some time.

Up until what the press dubbed: “The Souness Revolution” in 1986, the clubs worked in roughly the same way – taking mainly young Scots from Junior Football and bringing them through in-house. Celtic, in the Bob Kelly Years, took in-house training to a new level and, to be fair to them, they, even today, are more likely to give young Scots a chance.

They found and polished some very-good young Scottish players, Bobby Collins and Paddy Crerand being perhaps the best of the Kelly Kids to become Scotland caps and then be sold on to English clubs, however, they held on to enough of their young talent to produce Scotland's greatest club team – The Lisbon Lions, nine of whom came through the ranks.

When it comes to buying-in non-Scots, certainly over the last decade, Celtic also have done it better than Rangers. I still believe, if Rangers had used their years of getting from League Two back to the Preemiership to nurture and train-on young Scottish talent, they might not be as in-thrall to foreign players who are patently Not Rangers Class than they are at the moment. They might also be in a better financial position, given the millionsd they have wasted in NRC players in recent seasons.

Philippe Clement may or may not be the Manager to get the club back to where they aspire to be; the jury is out on that question. However, I would suggest he is better equipped to do his job than some of the players and some of the Directors are to do theirs; and until the club recruits a better standard of player and a better standard of director, they Rangrs will continue to be a poor second to Celtic.

One single player might not make a difference – as for instanbce the arrival of Jim Baxter did back in 1961 – but what the club does need is to have A Real Rangers Man, a player ready to die for the cause, on the park and snarling at the badge-kissing under-performers around him.

The lack of such an animal is the biggest and most-glaring failure in the current under-performing squad.

The likes of Bobby Shearer, Alex Macdonald, John Brown and Lee McCulloch were bang average players, but, they were fans on the park who drove the team on. The lack of such players now, and the lack of a strong spine to the team – a very-good goalkeeper they have, but they lack a dominant centre-half, a midfield play-maker and a truly sharp striker – means the team is vulnerable.

But, perhaps most-crucially of all, they lack someone at the top with a vision for the club and the strength of purpose and character to give it direction and good management. If they don't get that man in-place, things will get even more messy and the lawyers, accountants and insolvency specialists could be in for another bonanza.








 

No comments:

Post a Comment